Solana’s decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem has emerged as a powerhouse in transaction volume and protocol growth, yet its native tokens remain significantly undervalued compared to peers like Ethereum. A recent report by financial giant Franklin Templeton highlights this paradox: while Solana’s top DeFi projects grew an average of 2446% in 2024—far outpacing Ethereum’s 150%—the market capitalization-to-revenue ratio for Solana DeFi stands at just 4.6x, compared to Ethereum’s 18.1x. This stark contrast paints Solana as a potential value洼地—undervalued but ripe with opportunity.
However, beneath the surface of record-breaking decentralized exchange (DEX) volumes lies a deeper structural challenge. After the MEME coin frenzy faded, on-chain activity plummeted by over 90%. Meanwhile, staking yields of 7–8% continue to siphon liquidity away from lending and yield-generating protocols, creating what some call an “ecosystem deadlock.” The upcoming SIMD-0228 inflation reduction proposal may be the key to unlocking this bottleneck—but it comes with risks.
Solana Dominates DEX Volume—But at What Cost?
Franklin Templeton’s analysis centers on Solana’s dominance in decentralized trading. In January alone, Solana’s DEX volume surpassed not only Ethereum’s but also the combined volume of all EVM-based chains, capturing 53% of global DEX activity. This achievement underscores Solana’s high-speed, low-cost architecture, which supports rapid execution and minimal fees—ideal conditions for traders and retail investors.
Further data reveals that Solana’s top five DeFi platforms saw explosive growth in 2024, averaging 2446% year-over-year increases, while Ethereum’s leading protocols managed only 150%. Despite this performance gap, investor valuation remains disproportionately low. With a market cap-to-income ratio of just 4.6x, Solana DeFi appears fundamentally underpriced relative to its revenue generation.
Yet transaction volume alone doesn’t tell the full story. While Solana excels as a trading hub, its lending and borrowing markets lag behind. This raises a critical question: is Solana evolving into a full-fledged financial ecosystem—or merely a high-throughput trading venue?
Trading Hub vs. Full-Stack Finance: Solana’s Identity Crisis
A closer look at the composition of top DeFi protocols on each chain reveals divergent philosophies. On Ethereum, the top five projects are primarily lending and staking platforms like Aave and Lido—infrastructure that mimics traditional banking functions such as credit issuance and asset custody.
In contrast, Solana’s top protocols by total value locked (TVL) are dominated by aggregators and DEXs like Jito and Orca. This suggests that Solana functions more like a securities exchange than a bank—a platform optimized for trading rather than long-term capital deployment.
This distinction becomes crucial when assessing ecosystem health. Ethereum struggles with maintaining sustainable value accrual amid rising competition, while Solana faces liquidity erosion post-MEME boom. Since peaking at $35 billion in daily DEX volume on January 18, activity dropped to just $2 billion by March 7—a decline of over 90%.
Meanwhile, TVL on Solana fell by 40% since January, though much of this drop correlates with SOL’s price decline rather than mass capital exits. When measured in native SOL tokens, TVL has remained relatively stable.
The Staking Magnet: Why Liquidity Favors Validators Over Lending
As MEME speculation cools and SOL prices correct, capital hasn’t fled the ecosystem—it’s shifted toward validator staking. Platforms like Jito have seen consistent inflows, with over 16.47 million SOL staked as of early March. Since January 1, 2025, net staking inflows are up 12% year-over-year.
Despite declining yields—JitoSOL’s APY fell to 8.41% in March—validator staking still outperforms most alternative DeFi strategies. For comparison, Kamino’s lending pools offer lower returns, making staking the default choice for risk-averse holders.
This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: high staking rewards attract liquidity, which reduces available capital for lending protocols, limiting their ability to generate competitive yields. The result? A fragmented DeFi landscape where one sector thrives at the expense of others.
SIMD-0228: Can Inflation Cuts Unlock DeFi Innovation?
To break this cycle, the Solana community is considering SIMD-0228, a bold proposal to slash annual SOL inflation by 80% and dynamically adjust staking rewards. If passed, the plan would reduce validator yields from ~8% to around 1.41%, assuming constant stake levels.
The goal is clear: redirect capital from passive staking into active DeFi applications like lending, derivatives, and structured products. By lowering the “risk-free” return floor, the protocol hopes to incentivize innovation and diversification across the ecosystem.
But this approach carries risks. Critics argue that forcing yield compression could backfire—capital might not flow into other Solana DeFi protocols but instead exit the chain entirely in search of higher returns elsewhere. Moreover, many so-called “high-yield” DeFi products on Solana—including those offering 12%+ returns—are themselves built on validator staking under the hood. Reducing base layer yields could trigger a cascade of collapses across re-staking and yield-aggregating platforms.
Lily Liu, Chair of the Solana Foundation, voiced concern on X (formerly Twitter), calling the proposal “too unfinished” and warning of unintended consequences. Her caution reflects broader uncertainty: can a top-down yield reset truly stimulate organic demand for DeFi services?
Beyond Yield: Building a Sustainable Value-Capture Engine
For Solana to evolve beyond a trading-centric model, it must develop deeper mechanisms for value capture and capital recycling. Simply cutting staking rewards isn’t enough—what’s needed is a new generation of protocols that offer composite yields, embedded utility, and cross-protocol synergy.
Imagine lending platforms that integrate MEV-sharing, liquid staking derivatives with embedded options, or credit scoring systems enabling uncollateralized loans—all leveraging Solana’s speed and composability. These innovations could create compelling alternatives to passive staking without relying solely on yield differentials.
Ethereum’s dominance in TVL (52% of all chains) highlights the importance of depth and maturity. Solana’s largest protocol, Jito, holds $2.32 billion in TVL—impressive, yet only enough to rank 13th on Ethereum. To close this gap, Solana needs more than hype; it needs sustainable economic design.
FAQ: Understanding Solana’s DeFi Crossroads
Q: Why is Solana DeFi considered undervalued?
A: Despite achieving higher transaction volumes and faster growth than Ethereum in 2024, Solana DeFi projects trade at a much lower market cap-to-revenue ratio (4.6x vs. 18.1x), suggesting potential undervaluation relative to fundamentals.
Q: What is SIMD-0228?
A: SIMD-0228 is a proposed protocol upgrade aiming to reduce Solana’s annual inflation by 80% and lower validator staking rewards from ~8% to ~1.4%, encouraging capital to flow into other DeFi sectors.
Q: How does staking affect lending protocols on Solana?
A: High staking yields (7–8%) act as a “liquidity sink,” drawing funds away from lending platforms that struggle to offer competitive returns, thereby limiting their growth and innovation.
Q: Will reducing staking rewards boost other DeFi sectors?
A: Potentially—but only if alternative protocols can offer attractive risk-adjusted returns. Otherwise, capital may leave Solana entirely in favor of higher-yielding ecosystems.
Q: Is Jito a lending or staking platform?
A: Jito is primarily a liquid staking provider—it allows users to stake SOL while retaining liquidity through jitoSOL tokens—but it does not offer traditional lending or borrowing services.
Q: Can Solana become a full competitor to Ethereum in DeFi?
A: Yes—but only if it expands beyond DEX dominance and builds robust infrastructure for lending, derivatives, and asset management that can sustainably capture value.
The path forward for Solana isn’t just about adjusting inflation or tweaking yields—it’s about reimagining how value circulates within the ecosystem. When staking evolves from a passive income tool into a gateway for advanced financial products, and when lending protocols offer more than incremental yield gains, Solana may finally achieve true DeFi maturity.
👉 See how leading blockchains are transforming passive staking into dynamic financial gateways.