The rapid adoption of digital technologies such as digital payments, cryptocurrency, and artificial intelligence has accelerated the digital transformation of commercial banks. While these innovations offer greater convenience and efficiency, they are also being exploited by criminals to conduct money laundering through crypto assets, cross-border transactions, and fraud schemes. As a result, financial institutions now face increasingly complex financial crime risks—and rising compliance costs.
According to a recent study by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Chinese enterprises incurred a staggering 148 billion yuan (approximately $20.4 billion) in financial crime compliance costs in 2023. Alarmingly, 98% of financial institutions reported an increase in compliance expenditures over the past year. This surge raises a critical question for the industry: How can financial institutions maintain regulatory compliance while optimizing operational efficiency and preserving a seamless customer experience?
👉 Discover how modern financial institutions are transforming compliance with smart automation tools.
The Rising Cost of Financial Crime Compliance
On April 23, the revised draft of China’s Anti-Money Laundering Law was submitted for deliberation at the ninth session of the 14th National People's Congress Standing Committee. This marks the first major overhaul of the law since its implementation in 2007—highlighting the growing urgency to address evolving financial crime threats.
Key updates in the draft include expanded liability for non-compliance and the inclusion of specific non-financial institutions under anti-money laundering (AML) obligations. These changes place additional pressure on organizations to strengthen their compliance frameworks, driving up both operational and technological investments.
Simultaneously, criminals are leveraging advanced technologies like cryptocurrency and AI to disguise illicit activities. The LexisNexis report reveals that 58% of respondents observed a significant rise in trade-based money laundering, while 59% noted increased corruption within supply chains. Moreover, financial crimes involving digital payments and AI have grown at the fastest pace over the past 12 months.
“From a cost-benefit perspective, banks are willing to invest in compliance,” said Huang Weilie, financial crime compliance expert at LexisNexis Risk Solutions. “By enhancing their technological capabilities and compliance standards, institutions can significantly improve the efficiency of financial crime monitoring.”
Breaking Down Compliance Costs
In the Asia-Pacific region, total financial crime compliance costs reached $45 billion in 2023, with human resources accounting for 41% of total expenses—the largest cost driver. In China specifically, labor costs dominate spending, followed by technology (32%), infrastructure (15%), and external outsourcing (12%).
This data underscores a critical challenge: as regulatory demands intensify, so does reliance on manual processes. However, over-reliance on human intervention leads to inefficiencies, higher error rates, and slower response times—factors that directly impact both compliance effectiveness and customer satisfaction.
Building a Collaborative Compliance Framework
To combat rising costs and complexity, experts suggest a strategic shift toward collaborative compliance models.
Huang Weilie advocates for the establishment of a compliance alliance mechanism, where financial institutions share real-time intelligence on suspicious activities. Drawing from international best practices, such alliances—often referred to as “bank coalitions”—enable participating institutions to pool resources, standardize risk detection protocols, and collectively respond to emerging threats.
For example, a “digital identity” service used within such alliances can help identify sophisticated phishing or scam websites. If Bank A detects a fraudulent transaction linked to a crypto wallet, this information is instantly shared across the network. Other member banks can then proactively block similar transactions—dramatically reducing duplication of effort and improving detection speed.
👉 Explore how secure digital identity systems are reshaping fraud prevention in real time.
Such cooperative frameworks not only enhance detection accuracy but also reduce redundant investigations—a major source of cost inflation. By building shared risk monitoring mechanisms, institutions can achieve faster, more accurate identification of money laundering patterns without compromising data privacy or competitive integrity.
Automating Compliance Without Losing Human Insight
While collaboration reduces workload, automation remains one of the most effective tools for lowering labor-intensive compliance tasks.
Implementing AI-powered transaction monitoring systems allows banks to process vast volumes of data in real time, flagging anomalies based on behavioral patterns rather than rigid rules. These systems can significantly reduce false positives—common in traditional rule-based models—and free up compliance officers to focus on high-risk cases requiring expert judgment.
However, Huang emphasizes that automation cannot replace human expertise. Emerging threats like terrorist financing via decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms or AI-generated synthetic identities demand nuanced analysis that only trained professionals can provide.
“The key is integration,” he explains. “Automated tools should support—not replace—compliance teams. The goal is to streamline routine checks while empowering specialists to investigate complex cases more effectively.”
This hybrid model balances cost control with risk mitigation, ensuring that compliance remains both scalable and intelligent.
Achieving Balance: Compliance Meets Customer Experience
In today’s hyper-competitive digital landscape, customer experience is a key differentiator. A 2023 Forrester survey of 1,181 senior financial decision-makers worldwide found that APAC institutions struggle most with meeting customer expectations for instant payments due to compliance bottlenecks.
Customers expect near-instant fund transfers, but lengthy Know Your Customer (KYC) verifications and transaction screenings often cause delays. As fraud tactics evolve, institutions become more cautious—further complicating onboarding and payment processing.
Unsurprisingly, two top priorities for financial leaders over the next 12 months are:
- Improving customer experience
- Reducing compliance costs while increasing efficiency
These goals are not mutually exclusive. With the right strategies, institutions can achieve both.
Three Strategies for Harmonizing Compliance and CX
- Enhance Transparency and Streamline Processes
Provide clear communication about verification steps and estimated processing times. Simplify forms, minimize repetitive requests, and use progressive profiling to collect data gradually—improving completion rates and reducing drop-offs. - Leverage Technology for Smarter Workflows
Deploy machine learning models to pre-validate customer identities using trusted data sources. Integrate biometric authentication and document verification APIs to accelerate onboarding—all while maintaining AML compliance. - Invest in Continuous Employee Training
Equip frontline staff with up-to-date knowledge on emerging fraud trends and regulatory requirements. Regular training ensures consistent application of policies and improves incident response times.
“Prioritizing customer experience isn’t just about convenience—it’s a core component of proactive risk management,” says Huang. “When customers feel informed and respected during compliance checks, they’re more likely to remain loyal—even when delays occur.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why are financial crime compliance costs rising so rapidly?
A: Increased regulatory scrutiny, broader obligation scopes (including non-financial entities), and growing use of digital payment methods contribute to higher labor, technology, and operational expenses.
Q: Can automation fully replace human involvement in AML monitoring?
A: No. While automation excels at processing large datasets and detecting patterns, human analysts are essential for interpreting complex behaviors and making final judgments on suspicious activities.
Q: What is a compliance alliance?
A: It’s a collaborative network where financial institutions securely share anonymized data on fraud and money laundering attempts to improve collective detection and response efficiency.
Q: How does compliance affect customer experience?
A: Overly complex or slow KYC processes can frustrate users and lead to abandonment. However, transparent communication and efficient digital workflows can maintain trust and satisfaction.
Q: Is it possible to reduce compliance costs without increasing risk?
A: Yes—through strategic investments in automation, staff training, and inter-institutional cooperation, organizations can enhance efficiency while strengthening their defenses.
Q: What role does AI play in modern AML systems?
A: AI helps detect unusual transaction patterns, reduces false positives, enables real-time monitoring, and adapts to new fraud tactics—making compliance faster and more accurate.
By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and placing customer needs at the center of design, financial institutions can navigate the delicate balance between regulatory adherence, cost efficiency, and user satisfaction—turning compliance from a burden into a competitive advantage.
Core Keywords: financial crime compliance, anti-money laundering, compliance cost, digital identity, automated monitoring, customer experience, regulatory compliance, compliance alliance