Pairs trading is a market-neutral strategy that involves simultaneously buying one asset and shorting another with the expectation that their price relationship will revert to a historical norm. This approach is especially appealing in volatile or uncertain markets, as it aims to profit from relative price movements rather than directional market trends.
At its core, pairs trading capitalizes on temporary divergences between two correlated assets. When prices drift apart, traders enter positions betting on convergence. If the relationship normalizes, profits are realized. This strategy is widely used in algorithmic and quantitative trading circles due to its statistical foundation and risk-mitigated design.
How to Visually Test a Pairs Trading Strategy
Before diving into complex coding or statistical models, you can use visual testing to quickly assess whether two assets might be suitable for a pairs trade. This method allows you to observe historical price behavior and identify recurring patterns of divergence and convergence.
Step 1: Choose Two Correlated Assets
The success of pairs trading hinges on selecting two assets that historically move together. Consider assets within the same sector, region, or asset class—such as futures and ETFs tracking the same index.
For this example, we’ll examine:
- FTSE 100 Index Futures (Z) – a futures contract tracking top UK stocks
- iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) – an ETF offering similar exposure
Both instruments reflect the performance of major British equities, making them strong candidates for pairs analysis.
Note: This example is for educational purposes only. Always conduct thorough research before live trading.
Step 2: Chart the Assets Using TradingView
To begin visual testing, use a platform like TradingView to overlay the price charts.
Step A: Find Z (FTSE 100 Futures)
Search for "Z" and select Z1!, which represents a continuous futures contract. Unlike standard futures, Z1! stitches together active contracts to provide a long-term price series—ideal for historical analysis.
Step B: Open a Full-Featured Chart
This enables advanced tools and customization options.
Step C: Add EWU to the Chart
Click the "+" icon, search for "EWU," and add iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF to the same chart.
Now you’ll see both assets plotted together—typically with Z in blue and EWU in red.
Step D: Clean Up the Chart
- Remove volume bars by clicking the "Vol" cross
- Change Z from an area chart to a line chart for clearer comparison
👉 Discover how to refine your trading strategy with real-time data analysis tools.
Understanding Overlaid Charts
TradingView aligns overlaid assets by percentage change from the leftmost point. For instance, if both start on December 28, 2016, their initial values are normalized to 0%. Any subsequent movement reflects percentage deviation from that point.
This normalization makes it easier to compare relative performance—even if the original prices differ significantly.
Step 3: Conduct Visual Backtesting
Now that your chart is set up, it’s time to simulate trades based on observed patterns.
Step A: Zoom Into a Specific Timeframe
Start around January 1, 2019, and zoom into a two-month window for detailed analysis.
Step B: Identify Divergences
Look for moments when one asset outperforms the other. For example, on January 28, 2019, Z (blue) lags behind EWU (red)—a potential entry point.
Assume you:
- Buy $100 of Z (long)
- Short $100 of EWU (short)
This creates a market-neutral position.
Step C: Shift Focus Forward
Move your reference point forward to track the trade’s evolution.
Step D: Watch for Convergence
On February 13, 2019, Z gains 6.56% while EWU rises only 3.62%. The spread narrows—time to exit.
Your results:
- Long Z: $100 → $106.56 (+$6.56)
- Short EWU: $100 → $96.38 (+$3.62 profit)
- Total profit: $10.18 on $200 exposure = 5.09% return
Wait—earlier calculation said 1.47%? That was incorrect. The correct net gain is $6.56 + $3.62 = $10.18, yielding over 5% in two weeks—a compelling edge if repeatable.
Step E: Repeat Across Multiple Periods
Scan other timeframes for similar patterns. Record each hypothetical trade’s outcome to estimate win rate and average return.
Step F: Evaluate Strategy Viability
If consistent convergence appears after divergence, consider advancing to statistical backtesting using code-based tools like Python or specialized software.
👉 Learn how algorithmic strategies can be optimized using advanced market analytics.
Key Considerations in Pairs Trading
Data Quality Matters
Ensure both assets have overlapping trading hours and reliable pricing data. For example:
- Z trades during UK futures hours
- EWU trades on US exchanges
Different closing times may affect execution accuracy. Relying solely on end-of-day data could introduce slippage or mispricing risks.
For robust results, source high-quality historical data directly from brokers like Interactive Brokers.
Avoid Look-Ahead Bias
Never base entry decisions on future price movements visible on the chart. Doing so invalidates your test by incorporating information unavailable at the time of trade.
Stick to a strict rule: only analyze data up to the entry point.
Measure Average Deviations
Track typical spread fluctuations over time. If average divergence is 3%, consider entering trades at 5%. Adjust thresholds dynamically as market conditions change.
Use the Top-Down Approach
Retail traders benefit most from starting with economically logical pairings:
- Same-country bonds (e.g., US vs Germany)
- ETFs vs futures on same index
- Large-cap vs small-cap regional funds
Avoid purely data-mined correlations without fundamental justification—they may be spurious correlations with no predictive power.
Diversify Across Multiple Pairs
Relying on a single stock pair is risky. Instead:
- Trade dozens or hundreds of pairs
- Size positions small (e.g., 5% capital per pair)
- Let statistical edges compound over many trades
This reduces portfolio volatility and protects against individual pair breakdowns.
Hedge Using Volatility Adjustments
Equal dollar allocation often fails when assets have different volatilities. Instead:
- Scale positions based on beta or standard deviation
- Example: If Carnival Cruises has lower beta than Royal Caribbean, buy more Carnival shares per unit shorted
This balances risk exposure and improves hedge effectiveness.
Consider Leading Indicators
Instead of just comparing two assets, analyze what drives them:
- Bond yield spreads predicting equity ETFs
- Commodity prices leading mining stocks
- Macro indicators influencing currency pairs
These layers add predictive power beyond simple price correlation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I use pairs trading with cryptocurrencies?
A: Yes—especially with stablecoin pairs or correlated altcoins. However, crypto markets often lack fundamental drivers, increasing reliance on statistical models.
Q: How do I know if two assets are truly cointegrated?
A: Use statistical tests like the Engle-Granger test or Johansen test to confirm cointegration—indicating a long-term equilibrium relationship beyond mere correlation.
Q: Is pairs trading still profitable in 2025?
A: Yes, but competition is fierce. Success requires unique insights, superior data, or faster execution. Adding qualitative analysis helps beat purely quantitative funds.
Q: Should I always trade equal dollar amounts?
A: No. Adjust position sizes based on volatility, beta, or ATR (Average True Range) to balance risk between legs.
Q: What causes a pairs trade to fail?
A: Structural shifts (e.g., regulatory changes), broken correlations during crises, or poor timing due to low liquidity can all lead to losses.
Q: Can I automate pairs trading strategies?
A: Absolutely. Many traders use Python libraries like statsmodels or platforms like QuantConnect to automate detection, entry, and exit logic.
👉 Explore how automated trading systems can enhance execution speed and consistency.
Final Thoughts
Pairs trading offers a disciplined way to profit from mean-reverting relationships between correlated assets. While visual testing provides a fast entry point, long-term success demands rigorous backtesting, risk management, and continuous refinement.
By combining economic logic with statistical validation—and avoiding common pitfalls like look-ahead bias—you can build a resilient strategy capable of generating consistent returns across market cycles.