The Bitcoin ecosystem is undergoing a transformative phase, with Layer2 (L2) solutions emerging as pivotal players in enhancing scalability and functionality. Unlike Ethereum, which has a more standardized path toward L2 adoption via Rollups, Bitcoin lacks a universally accepted "canonical" Layer2 framework. This absence has opened the door for innovative — and sometimes controversial — approaches, such as leveraging EVM-compatible chains as de facto Bitcoin L2s.
This model treats Bitcoin’s mainnet primarily as a secure settlement layer while offloading computation and transaction throughput to high-performance EVM chains. However, this hybrid architecture introduces a critical challenge: Bitcoin-native wallets like Unisat or Xverse are incompatible with EVM environments, forcing users to rely on MetaMask or similar multi-chain tools. This friction disrupts user experience and creates barriers for native Bitcoin users, especially those drawn into the ecosystem through inscriptions and ordinals.
Enter Particle Network — a project introducing BTC Connect, an account abstraction solution designed to bridge Bitcoin wallets directly to EVM chains without requiring users to switch tools or understand complex cross-chain mechanics.
Why Use EVM Chains as Bitcoin Layer2?
Bitcoin’s UTXO model and limited scripting capabilities make native smart contract development cumbersome. While promising technologies like BitVM and client-side validation are in early stages, they remain technically intricate and slow to deploy. In contrast, EVM chains offer:
- Mature developer ecosystems
- High throughput and low fees
- Full smart contract support
- Interoperability with DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 applications
Projects like Merlin Chain and LumiBit capitalize on these advantages by anchoring Bitcoin’s security while building scalable execution layers on EVM-compatible blockchains. Their approach is simple: lock BTC on the mainchain, mint wrapped BTC (or other representations) on an EVM chain, and enable rich interactions within that environment.
👉 Discover how seamless cross-chain integration can transform user experience
But the real bottleneck lies not in the technology itself — it's in user accessibility.
The Wallet Compatibility Problem
Bitcoin wallets such as Unisat, Xverse, or Leather use Bitcoin-specific cryptographic signatures based on ECDSA over secp256k1, but with different message formatting and signing logic than Ethereum’s personal_sign standard used by MetaMask. As a result:
- DApps cannot directly request signatures from Bitcoin wallets
- Users must manually transfer assets between wallets
- Private key management becomes fragmented
- Onboarding new users becomes unnecessarily complex
For example, a user holding BTC and BRC-20 tokens in Unisat who wants to participate in Merlin Chain’s DeFi protocols must:
- Bridge BTC to Merlin (e.g., via a dedicated portal)
- Receive wrapped BTC on Merlin
- Import or connect MetaMask to interact with DApps
- Manage two separate wallets and seed phrases
This disjointed flow contradicts the core principle of Web3: self-custody with simplicity.
Particle Network’s Solution: BTC Connect & Account Abstraction
Particle Network introduces BTC Connect, an account abstraction layer built on ERC-4337, enabling native Bitcoin wallets to interact seamlessly with EVM chains. Here’s how it works:
When a user connects their Unisat wallet to a supported DApp on Merlin Chain:
- Particle generates a corresponding smart contract wallet (Smart Account) on the EVM chain.
- This Smart Account acts as a proxy, linked cryptographically to the user’s Bitcoin address.
- All transaction signing requests are routed back to Unisat via Particle’s relay infrastructure.
- The user signs using their familiar Bitcoin wallet interface — no new keys, no MetaMask required.
Behind the scenes, Particle handles the translation between Bitcoin’s signing format and Ethereum’s EIP-1271 verification standard, ensuring full compatibility without compromising security.
Real-World Use Case Example
Imagine Alice wants to swap her bridged BTC for another token on Merlin Chain:
- She connects her Unisat wallet to the DEX.
- She initiates a swap — the DApp sends a transaction request to Particle’s backend.
- Particle forwards the signable payload to Unisat.
- Alice approves the action in Unisat (just like signing a Bitcoin transaction).
- Particle constructs and submits the valid EVM transaction using the Smart Account.
To Alice, it feels identical to using any Web2 service — except she retains full control of her keys.
Beyond Wallet Bridging: Advanced Features Enabled by AA
Because BTC Connect is built on ERC-4337, it unlocks powerful capabilities beyond simple compatibility:
- Gasless Transactions: Paymasters allow dApps or sponsors to cover gas fees, removing another barrier for new users.
- Batched Operations: Users can execute multiple actions (e.g., approve + swap + stake) in one click.
- Cross-Chain Messaging: With proper integrations, a single Unisat login could enable interactions across multiple EVM chains.
- Social Recovery: Future upgrades may support social recovery mechanisms for improved key management.
👉 Explore how next-gen wallet experiences are reshaping blockchain adoption
In essence, one Bitcoin wallet could eventually access the entire EVM universe — all without exposing users to technical complexity.
Challenges and Considerations
While promising, this architecture raises important questions:
1. Asset Security During Bridging
Transferring BTC or inscription-based assets (like BRC-20s) requires trust-minimized bridges. Projects must implement robust fraud-proof systems or decentralized validation layers to prevent theft or double-spending.
2. Indexing and Data Availability
EVM chains need reliable indexers to track Bitcoin state changes, including UTXO updates and inscription mints. Without accurate data pipelines, cross-chain operations risk inconsistency.
3. Decentralization Trade-offs
Some implementations rely on centralized sequencers or relayers. Long-term sustainability demands decentralization of these components.
4. User Education
Even with seamless UX, users should understand that wrapped assets are representations — not native BTC — and depend on bridge integrity.
FAQ: Common Questions About Bitcoin L2s and Wallet Integration
Q: Can I use my Unisat wallet directly on Ethereum or other EVM chains?
A: Not natively — but with Particle’s BTC Connect, you can interact with EVM-based DApps without leaving Unisat. The system abstracts away technical differences behind the scenes.
Q: Is my private key ever exposed when using account abstraction?
A: No. Your private key remains securely within your Bitcoin wallet. Particle only receives signed messages; it never accesses your keys.
Q: What happens if the bridge gets hacked?
A: The security of bridged assets depends on the bridge design. Trust-minimized models (e.g., fraud proofs or ZK proofs) reduce risk compared to centralized custodians.
Q: Does this make Bitcoin ‘Ethereum-like’?
A: Not exactly. Bitcoin retains its role as a secure settlement layer. The EVM chain handles execution — combining strengths without altering Bitcoin’s core properties.
Q: Are there gas fees involved?
A: Yes — but thanks to paymaster support, dApps can sponsor gas costs for users, enabling truly gasless experiences.
Q: Can I move inscriptions (e.g., BRC-20 tokens) using this method?
A: Currently, most solutions focus on BTC bridging. Supporting inscriptions requires additional infrastructure for tracking and verifying metadata across chains — an area under active development.
Final Thoughts: Pragmatism Over Purity
Critics may argue that using EVM chains as Bitcoin L2s deviates from “true” Bitcoin ideals — favoring convenience over native innovation like BitVM or Taproot Assets. But history shows that adoption often favors usability over theoretical purity. Ethereum’s Rollup-centric roadmap wasn’t obvious at first; it emerged from experimentation and market feedback.
Similarly, treating EVM chains as pragmatic extensions of Bitcoin’s ecosystem allows rapid iteration, broad access, and immediate utility — especially for users already invested in Bitcoin’s cultural and economic momentum.
Particle Network’s BTC Connect exemplifies this trend: solving real-world friction with elegant engineering, enabling millions of Bitcoin holders to explore DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 without abandoning their preferred tools.
👉 See how unified crypto experiences are evolving in 2025
As the Bitcoin L2 landscape evolves, solutions that prioritize interoperability, security, and user-centric design will likely shape the future — regardless of ideological debates.